United States v. Gallaway

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 2002
Docket01-41110
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gallaway (United States v. Gallaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gallaway, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41110 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERALD GALLAWAY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:00-CR-62-1 -------------------- May 23, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerald Gallaway appeals his 151-month sentence following his

jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to distribute and possession

with the intent to distribute cocaine base and heroin, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Gallaway contends

that his sentence was imposed in violation of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-41110 -2-

Gallaway did not challenge his sentence on these grounds in

the district court, thus, this court reviews his assertion for

plain error only. See United States v. Vasquez-Zamora, 253 F.3d

211, 213 (5th Cir. 2001). Because Gallaway was sentenced below

the statutory maximum for the offense charged in his indictment,

there was no Apprendi violation. See United States v. Keith, 230

F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1182

(2001); United States v. Randle, 259 F.3d 319, 322 (5th Cir.

2001). Gallaway has not shown plain error; indeed, he has not

shown any error at all. Accordingly, we AFFIRM.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Keith
230 F.3d 784 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Vasquez-Zamora
253 F.3d 211 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Randle
259 F.3d 319 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gallaway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gallaway-ca5-2002.