United States v. Galbamez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Galbamez

591 F. App'x 932

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 3, 2015·No. No. 14-10874·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, counsel for Jose Galda-mez, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Galdamez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Chet Kaufman, counsel for Jose Galda-mez, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Galdamez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Galbamez, 591 F. App'x 932 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

591 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Galbamez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related