United States v. GALARZA

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedSeptember 19, 2023
Docket202300004
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. GALARZA (United States v. GALARZA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. GALARZA, (N.M. 2023).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HACKEL, KIRKBY, and GROSS Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Nicholas H. GALARZA Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202300004

Decided: 19 September 2023

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Yong J. Lee

Sentence adjudged 4 October 2022 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for six months, and a bad-conduct discharge.1

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Doug Ottenwess, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with six days pretrial confinement credit. As an act of

clemency, the convening authority suspended two months of the adjudged confinement for a period of six months, at which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended con- finement would be remitted without further action.

19 October 2023: Administrative Correction to correct scribners errors in the caption. United States v. Galarza, NMCCA No. 202300004 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case, we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correct in law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substan- tial rights occurred.2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

J. TRAVIS WILLIAMSON Acting Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. GALARZA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-galarza-nmcca-2023.