United States v. Galante

128 F.3d 788, 1997 WL 691146
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 5, 1997·No. No. 831, Docket 96-1464·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration by the active judges of the appellant’s suggestion for a rehearing in banc, the suggestion is denied; the court regards the panel decision as limited to its precise facts and not an invitation to district judges to depart downward in the absence of truly exceptional family circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Galante, 128 F.3d 788, 1997 WL 691146 (2d Cir. 1997).

128 F.3d 788 (United States v. Galante) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Carlos Carrasco
313 F.3d 750 (Second Circuit, 2002)
United States v. Wehrbein
61 F. Supp. 2d 958 (D. Nebraska, 1999)
United States v. Darnley Faria
161 F.3d 761 (Second Circuit, 1998)