United States v. Gage Skola

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 2019
Docket18-2475
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gage Skola (United States v. Gage Skola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gage Skola, (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-2475 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Gage Ferdinand Skola

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids ____________

Submitted: March 5, 2019 Filed: March 11, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Gage Ferdinand Skola appeals the above-Guidelines sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. Counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

After careful review, this court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Skola, as the record reflects the district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62, 464 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (appellate court first ensures no significant procedural error occurred, then considers substantive reasonableness of sentence under deferential abuse-of-discretion standard); United States v. Thorne, 896 F.3d 861, 862-63 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (affirming upward variance of 83 months where court properly weighed § 3553(a) factors); United States v. Mangum, 625 F.3d 466, 469-70 (8th Cir. 2010) (upward variance was reasonable where court made individualized assessment based on the facts presented). This court has independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and finds no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Mangum
625 F.3d 466 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Feemster
572 F.3d 455 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Billy Thorne
896 F.3d 861 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gage Skola, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gage-skola-ca8-2019.