United States v. Gabriel Sanchez-Cruz

548 F. App'x 252
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 11, 2013
Docket19-40253
StatusUnpublished

This text of 548 F. App'x 252 (United States v. Gabriel Sanchez-Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gabriel Sanchez-Cruz, 548 F. App'x 252 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Gabriel Sanchez-Cruz appeals the 57-month sentence imposed upon his guilty plea conviction for being found unlawfully present in the United States after having previously been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The district court enhanced Sanchez-Cruz’s sentence based upon its finding that his prior California conviction for lewd acts with a child aged 14 or 15 was a conviction for a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Sanchez-Cruz argues that the offense for which he was convicted did not qualify as a crime of violence because the statute under which he was convicted was overly broad and did not constitute “sexual abuse of a minor.”

Sanchez-Cruz did not object on this basis in the district court. Accordingly, we review for plain error only. See United States v. Chavez-Hernandez, 671 F.3d 494, 497 (5th Cir.2012). In 2006, Sanchez-Cruz was convicted under Cal.Penal Code Ann. *253 § 288(c)(1). Under a plain meaning approach, his conviction was for the enumerated offense of “sexual abuse of a minor” and, accordingly, a crime of violence under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). See § 2L1.2, comment (n.l(B)(iii)); United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 552-53 (5th Cir.2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed (June 6, 2013) (No. 12-10695). Sanchez-Cruz cannot demonstrate that the district court committed a clear or obvious error. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009); see also United States v. Henao-Melo, 591 F.3d 798, 806 (5th Cir.2009).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Henao-Melo
591 F.3d 798 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)
Puckett v. United States
556 U.S. 129 (Supreme Court, 2009)
United States v. Chavez-Hernandez
671 F.3d 494 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Jorge Rodriguez
711 F.3d 541 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
548 F. App'x 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gabriel-sanchez-cruz-ca5-2013.