United States v. Gabriel

123 F. App'x 1
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 2005
DocketNo. 03-3032
StatusPublished

This text of 123 F. App'x 1 (United States v. Gabriel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gabriel, 123 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the joint motion for remand and to expedite return of the mandate, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the court’s judgment filed April 16, 2004, be vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court appealed from in this cause be affirmed in part and the case remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this court’s opinion issued April 16, 2004, and the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gabriel-cadc-2005.