United States v. Gabino Tovias, Jr.

435 F. App'x 367
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2011
Docket10-10909
StatusUnpublished

This text of 435 F. App'x 367 (United States v. Gabino Tovias, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gabino Tovias, Jr., 435 F. App'x 367 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Gabino Tovias, Jr., pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to one count of conspiring to make false statements during the acquisition of a *368 firearm and one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm. He was sentenced to a total of 120 months of imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s decision to impose a four-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a) to his offense level for being an organizer or leader of criminal activity involving five or more participants, arguing that the presentence report’s findings establish that he was a leader or organizer of only three of the four other participants in the criminal association.

Our de novo review of the district court’s application of the Guideline reveals no error. See United States v. Moore, 635 F.3d 774, 776 (5th Cir.2011), petition for cert. filed, (June 13, 2011) (No. 10-11089). To warrant the four-level enhancement, a defendant need only be the leader or organizer of one other participant in a criminal association that involves at least five members. United States v. Ronning, 47 F.3d 710, 711-12 (5th Cir.1995). It is not necessary that he lead or organize every other participant. United States v. Curtis, 635 F.3d 704, 720 (5th Cir.2011), petition for cert. filed, (June 6, 2011) (No. 10-10931). Tovias concedes that he exerted control over three participants in the gun-buying scheme. That is more than sufficient to trigger application of the enhancement. Accordingly, the district court’s judgement is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ronning
47 F.3d 710 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Curtis
635 F.3d 704 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Moore
635 F.3d 774 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 F. App'x 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gabino-tovias-jr-ca5-2011.