United States v. G. Siegle Co.

S.D. New York

United States v. G. Siegle Co.

175 F. 885, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5771

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 13, 1909·No. No. 5,310·Published

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

This appeal relates to the classification for duty of certain “bronze lakes” and “scarlet lakes.” They were assessed for duty as “colors” at the rate of 30 per cent, ad valorem under paragraph 58, tariff act of 1897. Various alternative claims are set forth in the importers’ protests, but the one upon which they rely principally is that made under paragraph 54 of said act. The Board sustained the protest under said paragraph 54. I agree entirely with the Board’s reasoning, and think it unnecessary to add thereto.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLATT, District Judge.

This appeal relates to the classification for duty of certain “bronze lakes” and “scarlet lakes.” They were assessed for duty as “colors” at the rate of 30 per cent, ad valorem under paragraph 58, tariff act of 1897. Various alternative claims are set forth in the importers’ protests, but the one upon which they rely principally is that made under paragraph 54 of said act. The Board sustained the protest under said paragraph 54. I agree entirely with the Board’s reasoning, and think it unnecessary to add thereto.

Decision affirmed.

United States v. G. Siegle Co., 175 F. 885, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5771 (S.D.N.Y. 1909).

Pincite

175 F. 885 (United States v. G. Siegle Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.