United States v. G. Siegle Co.

S.D. New York

United States v. G. Siegle Co.

175 F. 885, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5771

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1909

DocketNo. 5,310

StatusPublished

This text of 175 F. 885 (United States v. G. Siegle Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. G. Siegle Co., 175 F. 885, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5771 (S.D.N.Y. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

This appeal relates to the classification for duty of certain “bronze lakes” and “scarlet lakes.” They were assessed for duty as “colors” at the rate of 30 per cent, ad valorem under paragraph 58, tariff act of 1897. Various alternative claims are set forth in the importers’ protests, but the one upon which they rely principally is that made under paragraph 54 of said act. The Board sustained the protest under said paragraph 54. I agree entirely with the Board’s reasoning, and think it unnecessary to add thereto.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLATT, District Judge.

This appeal relates to the classification for duty of certain “bronze lakes” and “scarlet lakes.” They were assessed for duty as “colors” at the rate of 30 per cent, ad valorem under paragraph 58, tariff act of 1897. Various alternative claims are set forth in the importers’ protests, but the one upon which they rely principally is that made under paragraph 54 of said act. The Board sustained the protest under said paragraph 54. I agree entirely with the Board’s reasoning, and think it unnecessary to add thereto.

Decision affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 F. 885, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-g-siegle-co-nysd-1909.