United States v. G. Amsinck & Co.

140 F. 96, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4765
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedMay 18, 1905
DocketNo. 3,464
StatusPublished

This text of 140 F. 96 (United States v. G. Amsinck & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. G. Amsinck & Co., 140 F. 96, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4765 (circtsdny 1905).

Opinion

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise in question, which was imported under Tariff Act 1890, c. 1244, 26 Stat. 567, was not withdrawn from warehouse until after the taking effect of Tariff Act Aug. 28, 1894, c. 349, 28 Stat. 509. The Board of Appraisers held that it was therefore subject to the provisions of the latter act. Erom this decision the United States appealed.

The decision of the. Board of Appraisers is affirmed, on the authority of U. S. v. Goodsell, 84 Fed. 439, 28 C. C. A. 453,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. E. L. Goodsell Co.
84 F. 439 (Second Circuit, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 F. 96, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-g-amsinck-co-circtsdny-1905.