United States v. G. Amsinck & Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

United States v. G. Amsinck & Co.

140 F. 96, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4765

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided May 18, 1905·No. No. 3,464·Published

Opinion

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise in question, which was imported under Tariff Act 1890, c. 1244, 26 Stat. 567, was not withdrawn from warehouse until after the taking effect of Tariff Act Aug. 28, 1894, c. 349, 28 Stat. 509. The Board of Appraisers held that it was therefore subject to the provisions of the latter act. Erom this decision the United States appealed.

The decision of the. Board of Appraisers is affirmed, on the authority of U. S. v. Goodsell, 84 Fed. 439, 28 C. C. A. 453,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOWNSEND, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise in question, which was imported under Tariff Act 1890, c. 1244, 26 Stat. 567, was not withdrawn from warehouse until after the taking effect of Tariff Act Aug. 28, 1894, c. 349, 28 Stat. 509. The Board of Appraisers held that it was therefore subject to the provisions of the latter act. Erom this decision the United States appealed.

The decision of the. Board of Appraisers is affirmed, on the authority of U. S. v. Goodsell, 84 Fed. 439, 28 C. C. A. 453,

United States v. G. Amsinck & Co., 140 F. 96, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4765 (circtsdny 1905).

Pincite

140 F. 96 (United States v. G. Amsinck & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related