United States v. Fuselier

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fuselier. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 F. App'x 388
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 8, 2003·No. 03-30438·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 5, 2003 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 03-30438 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID ANTHONY FUSELIER; BERRY LYNN HARRIS,

Defendants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:02-CR-20116-02 --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Beverly L. Harris on direct

appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Harris has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fuselier, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Fuselier (United States v. Fuselier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)