United States v. Fuller

300 F. App'x 250
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Fuller. Read the opinion of the Court — 404 F. App'x 713
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2008·No. No. 08-4465·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lesa R. Fuller pled guilty to embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. § 656 (2006) and was sentenced to twenty-one months of imprisonment. On appeal, Fuller alleges that the district court erred by enhancing her sentence by two levels for abusing a position of trust under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“USSG”) § 3B1.3 (2007). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

We find no clear error in the district court’s decision to impose the enhancement. United States v. Gordon, 61 F.3d 263, 269 (4th Cir.1995) (providing standard). The record reveals that Fuller’s position of being a “personal banker” clearly aided her crime and provided her with authority beyond “an ordinary bank teller.” USSG § 3B1.3, comment, (n.l). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fuller, 300 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2008).

300 F. App'x 250 (United States v. Fuller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sophia Gordon
61 F.3d 263 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)