United States v. Fuentes-Villarreal

108 F. App'x 204
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2004
Docket03-11225
StatusUnpublished

This text of 108 F. App'x 204 (United States v. Fuentes-Villarreal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fuentes-Villarreal, 108 F. App'x 204 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Javier Fuentes-Villarreal was convicted of one charge of illegal reentry into the United States. The district court sentenced him to 88 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Fuentes-Villarreal argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment based on an alleged violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial.

Fuentes-Villarreal has not shown that the district court erred in denying his motion. Fuentes-Villarreal has not shown that he is entitled to a presumption of prejudice in connection with the delay between his indictment and prosecution, nor has he shown actual prejudice arising from this delay. See United States v. Serna-Villarreal, 352 F.3d 225, 230 (5th Cir.2003), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 1896, 158 L.Ed.2d 481 (2004). Accordingly, the district court’s denial of Fuentes-Villarreal’s motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Serna-Villarreal
352 F.3d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
McBarron v. United States
541 U.S. 980 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 F. App'x 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fuentes-villarreal-ca5-2004.