United States v. Fryer
This text of United States v. Fryer (United States v. Fryer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before HOLIFIELD, STARITA, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Anthony J. FRYER Hospital Corpsman Second Class (E-5), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201900324
Decided: 28 April 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judges: Jonathan T. Stephens (arraignment) Aaron C. Rugh (trial)
Sentence adjudged 26 July 2019 by a general court-martial convened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of officer and enlisted members. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-3, con- finement for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Daniel O. Moore, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. United States v. Fryer, NMCCA No. 201900324 Opinion of the Court
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Fryer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fryer-nmcca-2021.