United States v. Fruetel

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fruetel

34 F. App'x 929

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2002·No. No. 02-6023·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Rae Fruetel appeals the district court’s order denying her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(1) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fruetel, No. CR-91-70 (E.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Rae Fruetel appeals the district court’s order denying her petition to modify the terms of her supervised release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3583(e)(1) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fruetel, No. CR-91-70 (E.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Fruetel, 34 F. App'x 929 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

34 F. App'x 929 (United States v. Fruetel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related