United States v. Frost
This text of 104 F. App'x 682 (United States v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Roy L. Frost appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for possession of an unregistered firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5845(a), 5861(d).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Frost has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Frost has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
[683]*683Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frost-ca9-2004.