United States v. Frierson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Frierson

173 F. App'x 305

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 4, 2006·No. No. 05-7755·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerry L. Frierson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Correct Plain Error” in his criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Frierson, No. CR-03-631 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 21, 2005; entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jerry L. Frierson appeals the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Correct Plain Error” in his criminal judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Frierson, No. CR-03-631 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 21, 2005; entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Frierson, 173 F. App'x 305 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

173 F. App'x 305 (United States v. Frierson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.