United States v. Frierson
This text of United States v. Frierson (United States v. Frierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7755
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JERRY L. FRIERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-03-631)
Submitted: March 20, 2006 Decided: April 4, 2006
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry L. Frierson, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Jerry L. Frierson appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion to Correct Plain Error” in his criminal
judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Frierson, No. CR-03-631 (D.S.C. filed
Oct. 21, 2005; entered Oct. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Frierson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frierson-ca4-2006.