United States v. Fregel

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Fregel

161 F. App'x 911

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 12, 2006·No. No. 05-11310; D.C. Docket No. 03-00400-CR-T-17-MSS·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Ostrander, appointed counsel for Lazaro Fregel in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fregel’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Fregel’s motion for enlargement of time in which to file a brief is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Ostrander, appointed counsel for Lazaro Fregel in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Fregel’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Fregel’s motion for enlargement of time in which to file a brief is DENIED.

United States v. Fregel, 161 F. App'x 911 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

161 F. App'x 911 (United States v. Fregel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related