United States v. Freeman

255 F. App'x 722

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Johney Freeman appeals the district court’s marginal orders denying his “Motion to Correct Clerical Errors” and “Supplemental Affidavit In Support of Motion.” Relying on Fed.R.Crim.P. 85(a) and 36, Freeman seeks to alter the district court’s docket entries and other notations related to his civil actions dismissed in 1994 and 1997. The criminal rules upon which Freeman relies provide him no relief in altering the district court’s treatment of his civil actions. See United States v. Fraley, 988 F.2d 4, 5-6 (4th Cir.1993) (noting limited scope of Criminal Rules 35 and 36). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.