United States v. Freeman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6937
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHNEY FREEMAN, a/k/a Johnny Freeman, a/k/a Johnny, a/k/a Mr. J, a/k/a J,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-88-76-N, CA-97-409)
Submitted: June 30, 1998 Decided: August 27, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johney Freeman, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Freeman, Nos. CR-88-76-N; CA-97-409 (E.D.
Va. June 11, 1997). Our decision intimates nothing about the retro-
activity of the one-year limitations imposed by the Antiterrorism
and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
Supp. 1998), because Appellant filed this action over one year
after the effective date of the statute. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Freeman (United States v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.