United States v. Freeman Anthony Farley
This text of 14 F.3d 602 (United States v. Freeman Anthony Farley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
14 F.3d 602
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Freeman Anthony FARLEY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6242.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 8, 1993.
Before: KENNEDY, NORRIS, Circuit Judges; and KRUPANSKY, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
One of the issues raised in this appeal is the refusal of the District Court to consider whether certain of defendant's prior convictions are constitutionally valid. Our recent en banc decision in United States v. McGlocklin, No. 91-6121, --- F.3d ----, 1993 WL 356406 (6th Cir., Sept. 17, 1993) (en banc) requires that issue be addressed. We vacate the judgment and remand that issue to the District Court for consideration in light of McGlocklin.1
Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.
On October 12, 1993, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Custis v. United States, 988 F.2d 1355 (4th Cir.1993), cert. granted 62 U.S.L.W. 3272, No. 93-5209 (Oct. 12, 1993), an opinion relied upon by the plurality in McGlocklin
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F.3d 602, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37281, 1993 WL 503715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-freeman-anthony-farley-ca6-1993.