United States v. Fredel Williamson, A/K/A "Fred"

47 F.3d 1090, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5495, 1995 WL 81980
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 1995
Docket89-8938
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 47 F.3d 1090 (United States v. Fredel Williamson, A/K/A "Fred") is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fredel Williamson, A/K/A "Fred", 47 F.3d 1090, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5495, 1995 WL 81980 (11th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In its opinion published as Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994), the United States *1091 Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment and remanded the ease for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.

Further proceedings in this case will involve issues relating to the government’s ability or desire to continue this prosecution, issues that can be better resolved in the district court.

Accordingly, this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
758 F.3d 633 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. McVeigh
940 F. Supp. 1541 (D. Colorado, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 F.3d 1090, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5495, 1995 WL 81980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fredel-williamson-aka-fred-ca11-1995.