United States v. Freddie Ross

96 F. App'x 427
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 2004
Docket03-2700
StatusUnpublished

This text of 96 F. App'x 427 (United States v. Freddie Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Freddie Ross, 96 F. App'x 427 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Freddie Ross appeals the district court’s 1 partial denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) 2 motion for return of seized property, which included $8,400 in cash and several non-cash items. We have carefully reviewed the record, and we find no clear error. See United States v. Felici, 208 F.3d 667, 669-70 (8th Cir.2000) (standard of review), cert, denied, 581 U.S. 1201, 121 S.Ct. 1209, 149 L.Ed.2d 123 (2001). Police found the $8,400 inside Ross’s girlfriend’s bedroom closet, Ross initially denied any knowledge of the cash, and he later told police the cash belonged to a Vikings football player. In addition, Ross’s attorney conceded during the Rule 41 hearing that the motion was moot with respect to the seized non-cash items.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

2

. The substance of former subsection (e) is now found in subsection (g), with stylistic changes. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 41 advisory committee notes (2002 amend.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Rafael J. Felici
208 F.3d 667 (Eighth Circuit, 2000)
Calderon-Leal v. United States
531 U.S. 1201 (Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F. App'x 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-freddie-ross-ca8-2004.