United States v. Freddie Hayes

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Freddie Hayes

455 F. App'x 516

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 28, 2011

Docket10-10680

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 455 F. App'x 516 (United States v. Freddie Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Freddie Hayes, 455 F. App'x 516 (5th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Freddie Earl Hayes appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to 18 months of imprisonment. He argues that the district court plainly erred in considering punishment in imposing his sentence. During the pendency of this appeal, Hayes completed his sentence of imprisonment, *517 and he has no further term of imprisonment or supervised release to serve. The appeal is, therefore, moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Freddie Earl Hayes appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to 18 months of imprisonment. He argues that the district court plainly erred in considering punishment in imposing his sentence. During the pendency of this appeal, Hayes completed his sentence of imprisonment, *517 and he has no further term of imprisonment or supervised release to serve. The appeal is, therefore, moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

455 F. App'x 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-freddie-hayes-ca5-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack