United States v. Fred Mosley

505 F.2d 1251
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 30, 1974·No. 73-3336·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We reaffirm our holding that the district court erred in denying the request of defendant to give an instruction on a Bueno-type issue in a defense of entrapment. United States v. Bueno, 5 Cir., 1971, 447 F.2d 903. The evidence, although disputed, was that the government, through an informer, supplied the heroin which defendant was charged with distributing. See United States v. Soto, 5 Cir., 1974, 504 F.2d 557; and cf. United States v. Arias-Diaz, 5 Cir., 1974, 497 F.2d 165, 169, Fn. 4.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fred Mosley, 505 F.2d 1251 (5th Cir. 1974).

505 F.2d 1251 (United States v. Fred Mosley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Benlizar
459 F. Supp. 614 (District of Columbia, 1978)
United States v. Vincent Ingenito
531 F.2d 1174 (Second Circuit, 1976)