United States v. Fred Lamont Boone

460 F.2d 1285, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9545
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1972
Docket72-1070
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 1285 (United States v. Fred Lamont Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fred Lamont Boone, 460 F.2d 1285, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9545 (4th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On March 10, 1971, the appellant, Fred Lamont Boone, was charged in a three-count indictment with causing falsely made and forged bank checks to be transported from Richmond, Virginia, to New York, New York. On November 30, 1971, Boone was convicted by the court sitting without a jury and was sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment. In this appeal Boone contends that the evidence was insufficient to show that he caused the checks in question to be transported in interstate commerce. We find this contention to be without merit.

To satisfy the “interstate transportation” requirement in a prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, the Government need only show that an individual knowingly cashed a check in one state drawn on an out-of-state bank. Pereira v. United States, 347 U.S. 1, 9, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435 (1954); United States v. Webb, 443 F.2d 308, 310 (5th Cir. 1971). In the present ease each of the cheeks was drawn on the account of Bache and Company, Inc., at the Chase Manhattan Bank of New York and each check was cashed at a bank in Richmond, Virginia. These checks were *1286 then forwarded to the drawee bank in New York for collection. Moreover, two government experts testified that latent fingerprints belonging to Boone were found on the checks and that the endorsements appearing on the cheeks were written in Boone’s handwriting. There was, therefore, ample evidence to support Boone’s conviction.

Accordingly, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 1285, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fred-lamont-boone-ca4-1972.