United States v. Fred Joseph Waldenfels

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Fred Joseph Waldenfels

422 F.2d 1323, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10353

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 1970

Docket24539_1

StatusPublished

This text of 422 F.2d 1323 (United States v. Fred Joseph Waldenfels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Fred Joseph Waldenfels, 422 F.2d 1323, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10353 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, found guilty of smuggling seventeen pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, raises but one ground of alleged error on this appeal— namely: that the Assistant United States Attorney used prejudicial and inflammatory arguments to the jury. No objection was made to any of the twelve matters now charged to constitute error. Under the court’s cautionary instructions to the jury, we hold there was no error. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, found guilty of smuggling seventeen pounds of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, raises but one ground of alleged error on this appeal— namely: that the Assistant United States Attorney used prejudicial and inflammatory arguments to the jury. No objection was made to any of the twelve matters now charged to constitute error. Under the court’s cautionary instructions to the jury, we hold there was no error. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

422 F.2d 1323, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fred-joseph-waldenfels-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack