United States v. Fred Jacobs

74 F.3d 1234, 1996 WL 13985
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 16, 1996
Docket95-7353
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1234 (United States v. Fred Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fred Jacobs, 74 F.3d 1234, 1996 WL 13985 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1234
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Fred JACOBS, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-7353.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Jan. 16, 1996.

Fred Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the ten-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(b), and failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(b). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court entered its order on September 11, 1993; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on August 8, 1995. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robinson
361 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1960)
Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.
434 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1234, 1996 WL 13985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fred-jacobs-ca4-1996.