United States v. Fred Douglas Coston

469 F.2d 1153, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6405
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 6, 1972·No. 72-1853·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Fred Douglas Coston appeals from his conviction, after a plea of guilty, of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of the National Firearms Act, 26 U. S.C. § 5861. Coston contends that the weapon he possessed, a Blair Flare gun which he had loaded with a shotgun shell, was not a “firearm” within the meaning of the Act. The weapon, which had a length of 5% inches and a smooth bore, proved capable of being used as a shotgun when test-fired. These physical characteristics and firing capability made the weapon a firearm within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 5845. Cf. United States v. Shafer, 445 F.2d 579, 583 (7th *1154 Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 986, 92 S.Ct. 448, 30 L.Ed.2d 370 (1971); United States v. Williams, 427 F.2d 1031, 1033 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 909, 91 S.Ct. 154, 27 L.Ed.2d 149 (1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fred Douglas Coston, 469 F.2d 1153, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6405 (4th Cir. 1972).

469 F.2d 1153 (United States v. Fred Douglas Coston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Brady
710 F. Supp. 290 (D. Colorado, 1989)
State v. Medeiros
665 P.2d 181 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Sampson
422 N.E.2d 450 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1981)