United States v. Fred Douglas Coston

469 F.2d 1153, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6405
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 1972
Docket72-1853
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 469 F.2d 1153 (United States v. Fred Douglas Coston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fred Douglas Coston, 469 F.2d 1153, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6405 (4th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Fred Douglas Coston appeals from his conviction, after a plea of guilty, of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of the National Firearms Act, 26 U. S.C. § 5861. Coston contends that the weapon he possessed, a Blair Flare gun which he had loaded with a shotgun shell, was not a “firearm” within the meaning of the Act. The weapon, which had a length of 5% inches and a smooth bore, proved capable of being used as a shotgun when test-fired. These physical characteristics and firing capability made the weapon a firearm within the meaning of 26 U.S.C. § 5845. Cf. United States v. Shafer, 445 F.2d 579, 583 (7th *1154 Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 986, 92 S.Ct. 448, 30 L.Ed.2d 370 (1971); United States v. Williams, 427 F.2d 1031, 1033 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 909, 91 S.Ct. 154, 27 L.Ed.2d 149 (1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brady
710 F. Supp. 290 (D. Colorado, 1989)
State v. Medeiros
665 P.2d 181 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 1983)
Commonwealth v. Sampson
422 N.E.2d 450 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 F.2d 1153, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fred-douglas-coston-ca4-1972.