United States v. Fred Angelo Patacchia, Juliette v. Coloma
610 F.2d 648, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9821
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 11, 1979·No. 79-1011·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The panel as constituted in the above case has voted to amend the opinion heretofore filed on August 13, 1979, 602 F.2d 218, as follows.
The sentence on page 3 beginning at line 3 is changed to read:
Agent Fullen could detect no suspicious odors around the trunk, although Agent Davis testified that he could.
Page 4, line 12 is changed to read as follows:
a trunk key when he was asked to open the trunk, (7) Patacchia’s sudden change in demeanor, and (8) the testimony of Agent Davis that he could smell marijuana before the trunk was opened.
With the opinion so amended, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Fred Angelo Patacchia, Juliette v. Coloma, 610 F.2d 648, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9821 (9th Cir. 1979).
610 F.2d 648 (United States v. Fred Angelo Patacchia, Juliette v. Coloma) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Pinder
489 A.2d 653 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1985)
United States v. Marilyn Jo Pruitt
719 F.2d 975 (Ninth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Paul Richard Portillo, United States of America v. Daniel C. Montellano
633 F.2d 1313 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)