United States v. Fray Moreno-Ramirez

348 F. App'x 198
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2009
Docket08-2554
StatusUnpublished

This text of 348 F. App'x 198 (United States v. Fray Moreno-Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fray Moreno-Ramirez, 348 F. App'x 198 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fray Moreno-Ramirez pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A) and 846, and two counts of distribution of 50 grams or more of a methamphetamine mixture, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). The district court 1 sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 120 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), seeking permission to withdraw and arguing that the sentence is unreasonable.

We conclude that Moreno-Ramirez’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Wadena, 470 F.3d 735, 737 (8th Cir.2006) (standard of review); United States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir.2003) (only authority for district court to depart from statutory minimum sentence is found in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and (f), which apply only when government makes motion for substantial assistance or defendant qualifies for safety-valve relief). After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw on condition that counsel inform Moreno-Ramirez about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for cer-tiorari.

1

. The Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Jose A. Chacon
330 F.3d 1065 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Darrell Eugene Wadena
470 F.3d 735 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 F. App'x 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fray-moreno-ramirez-ca8-2009.