United States v. Frasiel L. Hughey
This text of 907 F.2d 39 (United States v. Frasiel L. Hughey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
In United States v. Hughey, 877 F.2d 1256 (5th Cir.1989), we held that under a *40 sentence of plea of guilty on one count of credit card fraud, the sentence could include an order of restitution to other victims of appellant’s fraudulent activities in addition to restitution to the victim of the offense in which the plea of guilty was entered.
The United States Supreme Court has reversed our decision holding that under the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982,18 U.S.C. § 3579(a)(1), the sentence of conviction upon such a plea can provide only for restitution to the victim of the specific offense in which the guilty plea was entered. — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1979, 109 L.Ed.2d 408. The Supreme Court remanded to this Court for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion.
Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court, we remand the case to the district court for a revision of Hughey’s sentence to include restitution only to the victim of the particular offense to which Hughey pleaded guilty.
REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
907 F.2d 39, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 11741, 1990 WL 94581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frasiel-l-hughey-ca5-1990.