United States v. Franklin Dale Browner, Sr.

25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20859, 1994 WL 251176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 13, 1994
Docket93-7297
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1041 (United States v. Franklin Dale Browner, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Franklin Dale Browner, Sr., 25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20859, 1994 WL 251176 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

25 F.3d 1041
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Franklin Dale BROWNER, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-7297.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 24, 1994.
Decided: June 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-80, CA-93-170)

Franklin Dale Browner, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. United States v. Browner, Nos. CR-90-80; CA-93-170 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 18, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.3d 1041, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20859, 1994 WL 251176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-franklin-dale-browner-sr-ca4-1994.