United States v. Franklin

12 C.M.A. 477, 12 USCMA 477, 31 C.M.R. 63, 1961 CMA LEXIS 205, 1961 WL 4524
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided August 4, 1961·No. No. 15,014·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion

HomeR Ferguson, Judge;

Among other offenses, the accused was found guilty of breach of arrest, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 95, 10 USC § 895, and absence without leave, in violation of Code, supra, Article 86, 10 USC § 886. These offenses occurred at the same time and place but were treated separately for purposes of punishment. This was error. United States v Modesett, 9 USCMA 152, 24 CMR 414; United States v Lowe, 9 USCMA 215, 25 CMR 477; United States v Taglione, 9 USCMA 214, 25 CMR 476. Accordingly, corrective action must be taken.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy for further reference to the board and reassessment of the sentence in light of the multiplicity here involved.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Franklin, 12 C.M.A. 477, 12 USCMA 477, 31 C.M.R. 63, 1961 CMA LEXIS 205, 1961 WL 4524 (cma 1961).

12 C.M.A. 477 (United States v. Franklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Blackshire
33 M.J. 501 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1991)
United States v. Hill
26 M.J. 876 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1988)
United States v. Stein
20 C.M.A. 518 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1971)