United States v. Frankie Sanders
This text of 470 F. App'x 380 (United States v. Frankie Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Frankie L. Sanders appeals his conviction of embezzlement of union funds in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 501(c), for which he was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment and $10,078.40 of restitution. He argues that the district court erred in overruling his objection, based on Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), that the Government’s decision to strike one of the prospective jurors was racially motivated. However, we have held that a defendant waives appellate review of a Batson claim by failing to dispute the prosecution’s race-neutral explanation for striking the prospective juror. United States v. Arce, 997 F.2d 1123, 1126-27 (5th Cir.1993). By failing to dispute the Government’s explanations, Sanders appeared to acquiesce in them. See id. at 1127.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 F. App'x 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frankie-sanders-ca5-2012.