United States v. Frank Wilks

564 F. App'x 874
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 9, 2014
Docket12-2424
StatusUnpublished

This text of 564 F. App'x 874 (United States v. Frank Wilks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Frank Wilks, 564 F. App'x 874 (8th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frank Wilks appeals the sentence imposed on him after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Counsel has moved to withdraw, filing a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Counsel argues that the district court erred in determining that Wilks’s 1993 Missouri escape-from-custody conviction was a violent felony for section 924(e) purposes. Wilks also alleges that the court failed to explain how it applied the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors in determining the sentence and did not give adequate weight to Wilks’s physical and mental health problems.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied. The case is remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Tucker, 740 F.3d 1177 (8th Cir.2014) (en banc).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Alfred Tucker
740 F.3d 1177 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 F. App'x 874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frank-wilks-ca8-2014.