United States v. Frank Pannullo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 29, 2018·No. 17-13194·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-13194 Date Filed: 01/29/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-13194

Non-Argument Calendar

D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00222-MSS-JSS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANK PANNULLO

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

(January 29, 2018)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced

Case: 17-13194 Date Filed: 01/29/2018 Page: 2 of 2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); Williams v. United States, 396 F.3d 1340, 1342 (11th Cir. 2005) (defendant cannot avoid application of an appeal waiver by recasting a sentencing challenge as an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Frank Pannullo, (11th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Frank Pannullo (United States v. Frank Pannullo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. United States
396 F.3d 1340 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)