United States v. Frank Marfo
This text of United States v. Frank Marfo (United States v. Frank Marfo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-4913
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
FRANK MARFO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3)
Submitted: May 6, 2014 Decided: May 16, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank Marfo, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Frank Marfo appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion seeking the identities and notes of the grand juries
that returned the indictment and superseding indictment in this
case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Marfo, No. 1:11-cr-00657-MJG-3 (D. Md.
Nov. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Frank Marfo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frank-marfo-ca4-2014.