United States v. Frank Godino

695 F. App'x 1001
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 2017
Docket17-1262
StatusUnpublished

This text of 695 F. App'x 1001 (United States v. Frank Godino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Frank Godino, 695 F. App'x 1001 (8th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frank Godino appeals the district court’s 1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 10-month sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief questioning the reasonableness of Godino’s revocation sentence.

We conclude from our review of the record that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Godino. See United States v. Johnson, 827 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (appellate court reviews district court’s revocation sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th Cir. 2006) (revocation sentence may be unreasonable if district court fails to consider relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment).

The judgment is affirmed, and counsel is granted leave to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District'of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Duane Larison
432 F.3d 921 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Juan Johnson
827 F.3d 740 (Eighth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 F. App'x 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frank-godino-ca8-2017.