United States v. Frank Godino
This text of 695 F. App'x 1001 (United States v. Frank Godino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Frank Godino appeals the district court’s 1 order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 10-month sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief questioning the reasonableness of Godino’s revocation sentence.
We conclude from our review of the record that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Godino. See United States v. Johnson, 827 F.3d 740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (appellate court reviews district court’s revocation sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard); United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-24 (8th Cir. 2006) (revocation sentence may be unreasonable if district court fails to consider relevant § 3553(a) factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment).
The judgment is affirmed, and counsel is granted leave to withdraw.
. The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western District'of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 F. App'x 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frank-godino-ca8-2017.