United States v. Frank

Third Circuit

United States v. Frank

82 F.2d 315, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedFebruary 11, 1936

DocketNo. 5832

StatusPublished

This text of 82 F.2d 315 (United States v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Frank, 82 F.2d 315, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981 (3d Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The assignments of error are all based upon the proposition that the trial judge should have directed a verdict of not guilty. A careful perusal of the whole record discloses that there, was evidence which supports the verdict of guilty, and the entry of judgment and imposition of sentence follows.

The assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment affirmed, with directions that the sentence be carried into execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The assignments of error are all based upon the proposition that the trial judge should have directed a verdict of not guilty. A careful perusal of the whole record discloses that there, was evidence which supports the verdict of guilty, and the entry of judgment and imposition of sentence follows.

The assignments of error are overruled, and the judgment affirmed, with directions that the sentence be carried into execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 F.2d 315, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 2981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frank-ca3-1936.