United States v. Frank Bettelyoun

373 F. App'x 661
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2010·No. 09-3631·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frank Jayrold Bettelyoun appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 motion to correct a “clerical error” in the amended judgment in his criminal case. We agree with the district court that the amended judgment accurately reflects the sentence imposed; the type of error Bettelyoun alleged was not a clerical error, see United States v. Yakle, 463 F.3d 810, 811 (8th Cir.2006) (per curiam). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Batley, United Slates District Judge for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Frank Bettelyoun, 373 F. App'x 661 (8th Cir. 2010).

373 F. App'x 661 (United States v. Frank Bettelyoun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Calvin Eugene Yakle
463 F.3d 810 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)