United States v. Frank Agrama

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedApril 20, 2020
Docket2:19-cv-09204
StatusUnknown

This text of United States v. Frank Agrama (United States v. Frank Agrama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Frank Agrama, (C.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case No. 2:19-cv-09204-DDP-JC ) 11 Petitioner, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ) 12 v. ) ) 13 FRANK AGRAMA ) ) 14 Respondent. ) _________________________________ ) 15

16 Upon the petition of the United States, the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, 17 and the Declaration of James Pack, it is hereby ORDERED that the respondent, Frank 18 Agrama, show cause why he should not be compelled to obey the Internal Revenue 19 20 Service summons served upon him. 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 1 It is further ORDERED that: 2 1. A copy of this Order, together with the Petition, Memorandum of Points of 3 and Authorities, and Declaration of James Pack and its exhibits, shall be served 4 5 electronically upon counsel for respondent per agreement between the parties, within 30 6 days of the date that this Order is served upon counsel for the United States or as soon 7 thereafter as possible. 8 9 2. Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 1, above, shall be filed with 10 the Clerk as soon as practicable. 11 3. Since the file in this case reflects a prima facie showing that the examination 12 13 is being conducted for legitimate purposes, that the inquiries may be relevant to those 14 purposes, that the information sought is not already within the Commissioner’s 15 possession, and that the administrative steps required by the Internal Revenue Code have 16 17 been followed, United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964), the burden of coming 18 forward has shifted to the respondent to oppose enforcement of the summons. 19 20 4. If the respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the petition, 21 such defense or opposition shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk of Court and 22 copies served on counsel for the United States in Washington D.C., within 45 days of this 23 24 Order. The United States may file a reply memorandum to any opposition no later than 25 21 days after the filing of any opposition. 26 5. The Court will consider all issues raised by the respondent. Only those 27 issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit or 1 declaration will be considered. Any uncontested allegation in the petition will be 2 considered admitted. 3 6. The respondent may notify the Court, in a writing filed with the Clerk and 4 5 served on counsel for the United States in Washington, D.C., that he has no objection to 6 enforcement of the summonses. 7 7. The respondent is hereby notified that failure to comply with this Order may 8 9 subject him to sanctions for contempt of court. 10 Dated this 20th of April, 2020 11 _____________________________ HONORABLE DEAN D. PREGERSON 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Powell
379 U.S. 48 (Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Frank Agrama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-frank-agrama-cacd-2020.