United States v. Francois
This text of United States v. Francois (United States v. Francois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7658
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LEVELT FRANCOIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:88-cr-00051-CMH-1)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 30, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Levelt Francois, Appellant Pro Se. Adrienne Frazier, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Levelt Francois appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for production of documents and his motion to
have the district court review the government’s failure to file
a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. See Wade v. United States, 504
U.S. 181 (1992). We have reviewed the record and find that
Francois failed to make a sufficient showing to warrant a Wade
review. See id. at 186; United States v. Wallace, 22 F.3d 84,
87 (4th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
denial of Francois’ motions. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Francois, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francois-ca4-2009.