United States v. Francois

359 F. App'x 382
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2009·No. No. 09-7658·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Levelt Francois appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for production of documents and his motion to have the district court review the government’s failure to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. See Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181, 112 S.Ct. 1840, 118 L.Ed.2d 524 (1992). We have reviewed the record and find that Francois failed to make a sufficient showing to warrant a Wade review. See id. at 186, 112 S.Ct. 1840; United States v. Wallace, 22 F.3d 84, 87 (4th Cir.1994). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of Francois’ motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Francois, 359 F. App'x 382 (4th Cir. 2009).

359 F. App'x 382 (United States v. Francois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wade v. United States
504 U.S. 181 (Supreme Court, 1992)
United States v. James Darnell Wallace
22 F.3d 84 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)