United States v. Francisco Sanchez-Lopez

493 F. App'x 557
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 4, 2012
Docket11-51218
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 493 F. App'x 557 (United States v. Francisco Sanchez-Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Francisco Sanchez-Lopez, 493 F. App'x 557 (5th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Francisco Sanchez-Lopez appeals the 60-month sentence imposed after his *558 guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation. He argues that the district court committed error by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) based on his prior Texas conviction for aggravated robbery. Because Sanchez-Lopez raised this argument in the district court, our review is de novo. United States v. Sandoval-Ruiz, 543 F.3d 733, 734-35 (5th Cir.2008).

Under § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), a defendant’s base offense level is increased by 16 levels if he was previously deported after a conviction for a crime of violence. The commentary to § 2L1.2 provides that a prior conviction is a crime of violence if it qualifies as an enumerated offense or has “as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.” § 2L1.2, comment. (n.l(B)(iii)).

Robbery is an enumerated crime of violence under § 2L1.2, comment. (n.l(B)(iii)). In United States v. Santiesteban-Heman-dez, 469 F.3d 376, 378-82 (5th Cir.2006), we held that the definition of robbery under Texas Penal Code § 29.02 substantially corresponds to the generic, contemporary meaning of robbery and thus qualifies as an enumerated offense under § 2L1.2. Accordingly, it follows that the offense of aggravated robbery, as set forth in § 29.03 of the Texas Penal Code, is also a crime of violence because it includes every element required for a conviction under § 29.02. See § 29.03(a). Sanchez-Lopez therefore has not shown that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Tracy Truelove
707 F. App'x 281 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Daniel Morin
706 F. App'x 219 (Fifth Circuit, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 F. App'x 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francisco-sanchez-lopez-ca5-2012.