United States v. Francisco Ponce

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Francisco Ponce

449 F.2d 1299

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1971

Docket71-2469_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 449 F.2d 1299 (United States v. Francisco Ponce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Francisco Ponce, 449 F.2d 1299 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this marijuana smuggling and importation case.

We find the questioned search of the nearby dresser drawer unobjectionable. Searching for a possibly secreted weapon, incriminating telephone call records were found. If the scope of the search was justified, any material evidence found is admissible. On the facts here, the government is not defeated by Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969).

We find other issues raised without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in this marijuana smuggling and importation case.

We find the questioned search of the nearby dresser drawer unobjectionable. Searching for a possibly secreted weapon, incriminating telephone call records were found. If the scope of the search was justified, any material evidence found is admissible. On the facts here, the government is not defeated by Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969).

We find other issues raised without merit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

449 F.2d 1299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francisco-ponce-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack