United States v. Francisco Diaz Llamas
This text of 327 F.2d 657 (United States v. Francisco Diaz Llamas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
327 F.2d 657
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Francisco Diaz LLAMAS, Appellant.
No. 279, Docket 28554.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 21, 1964.
Decided Jan. 24, 1964.
Francisco Diaz Llamas, pro se.
Joseph P. Hoey, U.S. Atty., Eastern District of New York (Michael J. Gillen, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Counsel), for appellee.
Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The denial of appellant's motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to vacate the conviction which we affirmed in 280 F.2d 392 (2 Cir. 1960), is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Mishler.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
327 F.2d 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francisco-diaz-llamas-ca2-1964.