United States v. Francisco Campos-Fuerte

366 F.3d 691, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8167, 2004 WL 877646

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2004·No. 03-10055·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Opinion filed on February 4, 2004 and reported at 357 F.3d 956 is amended as follows: on Slip Opinion page 1612, Line 1, 357 F.3d at 958, the first sentence is amended to read:

This case requires us to decide whether a conviction under California Vehicle Code section 2800.2, as it existed in 1992, is a crime of violence as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 16(b).

*692 All subsequent footnotes are renumbered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Opinion filed on February 4, 2004 and reported at 357 F.3d 956 is amended as follows: on Slip Opinion page 1612, Line 1, 357 F.3d at 958, the first sentence is amended to read:

This case requires us to decide whether a conviction under California Vehicle Code section 2800.2, as it existed in 1992, is a crime of violence as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 16(b).

*692 All subsequent footnotes are renumbered accordingly.

United States v. Francisco Campos-Fuerte, 366 F.3d 691, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8167, 2004 WL 877646 (9th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

366 F.3d 691 (United States v. Francisco Campos-Fuerte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Covarrubias Teposte v. Holder

623 F.3d 1094 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Roberto Ortega-Mendez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

450 F.3d 1010 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)

Ortega-Mendez v. Gonzales

Ninth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Williams

117 F. App'x 496 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)

Campos-Fuerte v. United States

543 U.S. 859 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Opinion

Related