United States v. Francisco Baeza-Lozano

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Francisco Baeza-Lozano. Read the opinion of the Court — 505 F. App'x 373
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. 14-40810·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 14-40810 Document: 00513242478 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40810 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 22, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO BAEZA-LOZANO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-69-4

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Baeza-Lozano has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Baeza-Lozano has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 14-40810 Document: 00513242478 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015

No. 14-40810

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Francisco Baeza-Lozano, (5th Cir. 2015).

United States v. Francisco Baeza-Lozano (United States v. Francisco Baeza-Lozano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)