United States v. Francis

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedAugust 30, 2018
Docket201800178
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Francis (United States v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Francis, (N.M. 2018).

Opinion

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________

No. 201800178 _________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v.

RYAN F. FRANCIS Hospitalman (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant _________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander William H. Weiland, JAGC, U.S. Navy. For Appellant: Captain Kimberly D. Hinson, JAGC, USNR. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _________________________

Decided 30 August 2018 _________________________

Before HUTCHISON, TANG, and HINES, Appellate Military Judges _________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assign- ment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the con- vening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). The supplemental court-martial order shall reflect that the words “and a video” in Specification 1 of the Charge were withdrawn and dismissed without prejudice, to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate review, and the appellant was found guilty of Specification 1 of the Charge.

FOR THE COURT

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Francis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francis-nmcca-2018.