United States v. Francis

15 C.M.A. 390, 15 USCMA 390, 35 C.M.R. 362, 1965 CMA LEXIS 207, 1965 WL 4679
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 1965
DocketNo. 18,551
StatusPublished

This text of 15 C.M.A. 390 (United States v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Francis, 15 C.M.A. 390, 15 USCMA 390, 35 C.M.R. 362, 1965 CMA LEXIS 207, 1965 WL 4679 (cma 1965).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam:

In this case, as in United States v Tuten, 15 USCMA 387, 36 CMR 359, this day decided, a previous conviction was received in evidence without the exhibit establishing the date of commission of two offenses set forth therein. However, the record otherwise demonstrates accused was serving in his initial enlistment and that the crimes occurred within three years of the commission of an offense of which the accused was found guilty at this trial. Under the circumstances, therefore, no error appears in the court-martial’s consideration of the prior conviction on the question of sentence.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Tuten
15 C.M.A. 387 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 C.M.A. 390, 15 USCMA 390, 35 C.M.R. 362, 1965 CMA LEXIS 207, 1965 WL 4679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-francis-cma-1965.